Many of you will probably know the OMB Uniform Guidance Audits, formerly known as OMB A-133 audits. In the webinar posted above, Jameson & Company partner, Brian LaCroix explains the Uniform Guidance Audit (UGA), the process, findings and possible pitfalls. The following is based on the transcripts from this webinar.
The list of those who are required to have an OMB A-133 Uniform Guidance Audit is long.
Just because you have one or more of the awards above, doesn’t necessarily mean you’re going to be audited. Let’s talk about what triggers one of these audits to take place.
It all comes down to the amount you expend in your fiscal year.
Let’s say, you’ve spent $750,000 or more in federal funds during your company’s fiscal year. This $750,000 includes both direct, indirect and fixed fee amounts and it also includes amounts paid to subcontractors. If you exceed this $750,000 threshold you’re going to have to have an audit at the end of your company’s fiscal year.
The $750,000 threshold is measured based on your company’s fiscal year. So it doesn’t matter what the budget period is on your contract or grant. You have to measure it based on your company’s fiscal year.
NIH and DOE have payment systems called the Payment Management System and ASAP System, respectively. I have had clients ask me, “I only draw $748,000 in federal funds, do I still have to have the audit?” The answer is yes. If you’ve earned that much in grant money, just because you haven’t drawn the funds down doesn’t mean it’s exempt from audit.
The first thing you’re going to have to do is find an independent accounting firm that does this type of audit. Not many firms are qualified to perform these audits, as they require a deeper understanding of government grant accounting. This is one of Jameson & Company’s areas of expertise.
Once you secure a qualified accounting firm, you’ll receive an engagement letter that details the terms and conditions of how the audit will be performed and who is responsible for what.
As a rule:
After the engagement letter is squared away, the auditor you hire will develop a plan for what he or she will test during the audit. During this planning phase, the auditor will ask you a number of questions:
They will want to know about your accounting system.
They will want to know about company culture.
These questions will help the auditor determine how much risk they assess to the overall project and how much they have to test.
Your auditor will also ask you a number of fraud-related questions. Know that this is a requirement on any audit and these questions are asked to determine whether there is potential for fraud; they are not accusing you of doing wrong. However, if they hear something problematic or questionable, this will direct their testing.
After the audit planning is complete, your auditor will make his or her selections for testing. You have NO ability to dictate or sway what they test. Keep in mind, you have hired an independent auditor, as mandated by the UGA. This auditor is working on behalf of the Federal Government, not you, so they will test what needs to be tested.
Normally, you can count on the auditor testing about 60 transactions. In many cases, he or she will be able to use the same transactions for both internal control testing and compliance testing.
After the selections are made, field work begins. This is where the auditor examines the underlying documentation for the transactions being tested.
If he or she finds any issues with the charges on the grant, there are two choices:
This is an important consideration when it comes to choosing your independent auditor. It’s always best to have someone who’s an expert and knows how to resolve government award accounting issues.
After all the field work is completed, the final report is then issued and sent to the agency which mandated the audit.
Most agencies have an audit resolution office. Here, they’ll read your report and if there are any audit findings, they’ll contact you to make sure that you have fixed the problem. If you haven’t, then further investigation and action is taken.
As we discussed earlier, your auditor will ask you key questions and develop an audit plan based on your answers and their experience. As a rule, the following represent the key areas that they will test as part of that plan.
The first thing that they’re going to look at are costs that are charged to the grant and whether they are allowable or unallowable according to the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) part 31 and the granting agency’s policy and procedure manuals.
If you’re a for-profit company, the backbone of what’s allowable and what’s unallowable goes back to Federal Acquisition Regulations, part 31.
This section of the FAR will list all sorts of potential cost items and whether they are allowable or unallowable.
Nearly every funding agency has its own supplemental policy and procedure manual, which can override the FAR.
For instance, the FAR includes internal research and development costs as an allowable expense item. But in NIH’s supplemental policy and procedure manual, it states that the NIH will not pay for internal R & D as part of your indirect rates. Instead, you have to put it in the denominator when calculating your indirect cost rates so it can absorb its proportionate share of the company’s indirect cost.
When your auditor is going through and testing transactions, he’s using his understanding of these rules to determine if what you charged the government is reasonable.
Most likely, the next thing your auditor will look at is your timekeeping and labor distribution procedures. We get questions about this every week from potential clients and it comes up all the time when we’re doing presentations. Here’s the bottom line:
Everyone in your organization has to keep time sheets if you want their salaries reimbursed under your grant.
Whether the charges are indirect or direct, whether it’s the receptionist at the front desk or the Ph.D. working directly on the grant, everybody has to keep time sheets
In addition, salaries have to be distributed in the company’s general ledger based on the information that’s on the time sheets.
For example: You have a person who makes $1,000 a week. On their time sheet for the week, they’ve charged 20 hours directly to the grant and 20 hours to vacation time. The auditor will expect the general ledger to show a $500 charge directly to the grant and then $500 charge to vacation time for the week.
Timesheets have to be signed by both the employee and supervisor. If there are any corrections on the timesheet, they have to be scratched out in pen and initialed by the employee.
Of course, many businesses use automated timekeeping systems but the concept is the same. Both the employee and the supervisor must have password-protected signatures in an electronic time-keeping system, and there must be a forensic audit trail created by corrections made to the time sheets, and annotations have to be made to explain those corrections.
If you have budgeted items in your grant for direct equipment—items that are more than $5,000— then you have to keep an inventory of those items because you don’t have perfect title to the direct equipment. The government reserves the right to take that equipment back at the end of the grant.
You must maintain a listing of direct equipment. Most likely, the auditor will take a sample of several items and ask, “where is this on the laboratory floor?” He’ll walk out just to make sure the equipment exists and that you haven’t sold it. It’s a great idea to have a tagging system.
Next, the auditor will make sure you’re aware of any salary caps that exist under the grants in the agencies that are funding your innovation. For instance, NIH has a salary cap. That means you can only charge them so much in direct labor. Anything above the salary cap becomes an unallowable cost.
If you’re using the Payment Management System or ASAP, you have to submit a quarterly SF-425 aka Federal Financial Report (FFR). This report details all of the actual spending on your grant or grants in accordance with FAR Part 31 and the applicable agency regs.
One of the common mistakes we see with SF-425 reports is clients simply reporting spending amounts earned to be exactly equal to the amounts that were drawn. This may be improper. You have to be able to report what’s actually been spent on the grant regardless of how much money you have drawn down.
During a Uniform Guidance Audit, the auditor will take a careful look at your indirect cost rate. He or she will make sure that charges for the indirect cost side of the equation did not exceed any negotiated indirect rate agreements that you have with your funding agency.
If you’re an SBIR grantee, you may have taken the 40% maximum “safe” indirect cost rate. That 40% acts as a cap as to your indirect charges on the grant. Your auditor will test to make sure you are not charging in excess of the 40%.
If you have an NIH grant and you want to charge more than the 40%, you have to negotiate with the folks at the Division of Financial Advisory Services (DFAS) in order to get a negotiated indirect rate agreement letter.
The DOE doesn’t have a rate negotiation arm per se. For the most part, your auditor would look to make sure that the indirect cost charges for their grants is allowable and reasonable.
When you have grant funding, you may wonder, “Can I draw down all of the money now?”
The answer is no!
You can only draw down money that you’ve earned. As you spend the money, you’re able to draw down funds and be reimbursed from the Payment Management System and ASAP Systems.
Draw down example 1. We had a client who was really conservative. He didn’t want to draw down a single dime until he was 100% sure that it was audited and accepted by the federal government. He went two years, and once everything was audited and squared away, he drew down $1.2 million from the Payment Management System. It set off every bell and whistle in the place!
Different grant funding vehicles have different rules as to how much you can re-budget from one category to another without agency permission. If you exceed the cap, your auditor will look to make sure you have written permission in place for funds re-budgeted. Most research and development grants will allow for re-budgeting. There’s an understanding that research doesn’t always go as predicted so agencies are usually flexible.
Each grant that you receive will state a specific budget period of performance. Your auditor will check to ensure that your spending stays within this time frame.
Some grants will allow for pre-award charges. That’s taken into consideration as well. NIH, for instance, allows you to spend money 90 days before the project period begins. However, you are spending at risk before you get the award and back dating documents is a no-no.
This is a hot-button topic. For sub-recipient charges to be allowable, you have to have a subcontract agreement in place with the sub-recipient. You’re also required to monitor the subcontractor and determine whether they are charging the proper amounts on their part of the grant.
Sub-recipients are subject to the same cost requirements that you are and they also have to have an OMB Uniform Guidance Assistance audits or DOE assisted audit. As the prime grantee, you are required to make sure they are following the rules. This means you should:
In order for consulting costs to be allowable, they have to be supported by a consulting agreement. This agreement should detail the scope of work that’s going to be performed and the hourly rate that they are going to charge.
When your consultant provides you with an invoice for their work, that invoice should detail the hours worked, multiplied by the hourly rate and give the total charge. It should also annotate what was accomplished, and you should get a copy of any reports or significant notes that they produce.
As you can see, there’s a lot that can be tested during a Uniform Guidance Audit (aka OMB A-133), and there’s a lot that you are responsible for to keep straight.
If there are audit findings, they’re typically going to come in one of two different flavors.
If the controls in the accounting system that you have in place are not set up properly to account for your grant or contracts, then you may have what is called internal control findings.
If there are cost charging or monetary findings, those findings will also be written into the audit report. If it’s determined that you’ve overcharged the government – you will be required to give the money back.
First, the auditor will detail everything that was wrong during your audit in a list format, then submit it to the funding agency.
You will have to come up with a corrective action plan for the audit findings and submit that to your granting agency as well.
Then the people at the government audit resolution office will call you and verify that you have made the necessary corrections in order to avoid future findings.
We see this quite a bit: Individuals frequently spin out of universities and hospitals. They’re used to the non-profit way of dealing with timekeeping and labor accounting.
In the non-profit world, a lot of the labor accounting is based on percentage of effort. So they are used to submitting proposals that say 30% of my salary is going to be captured under one grant and another 70% is going to be captured under another grant. There’s very little need for time sheets after the fact because you have that support documented.
When you are a for-profit company profit, you’re subject to CFR 548 which requires that everyone keeps time sheets and that grant charges be based on “real life” time and not on percentages of effort and support.
This is pivotal: When you have a cost reimbursement grant, you have to apply your ACTUAL rates to the grant charges at the end of your year. We see grantees fail to do this – they do not apply final indirect cost rates to their grant charges.
Your indirect cost rates are measured based on your company’s fiscal year. So, for example, if you have an indirect rate agreement letter with DFAS that says you can apply 60% to your direct costs, you will charge your grant at 60% during the year. However, let’s suppose at the end of the year, you calculate your final actual indirect rate and you come in at 55%. You have to credit back the grant the difference between the 60% billed during the year and the 55% you actually incurred.
These are cost reimbursement type grants. You are not allowed to build profits by under-running your indirect cost rates. The same is true if you overrun your indirect rates a little bit. However, overruns are subject to any caps that you might have in your rate agreement letters.
As government grant accounting experts with over 30 years of experience assisting our clients by becoming part of their internal financial team. We work with you to make sure that internal controls are in place and running properly and that charges are properly accounted for. We typically help our clients hire the independent CPA firms and represent the client during the audit.
To learn about JamesonWorx, our FAR-compliant accounting system using Quickbooks Online, check out this blog.
To learn about our Risk & Compliance Analysis, click here.
To talk to one of our government award accounting experts, contact Ryan at email@example.com or 781.862.5170 ext. 2106.
Not all government contracts and grants are the same. Your funding agency, type of award, and funding stage require unique accounting requirements. Provide your information below to schedule a time to speak with one of our government funding experts!
Writing A Government Funding Proposal
Received A Pre-Award Notification
Received A Funding Award
National Institute of Health / HHS
Department of Defense (DOD)
National Science Foundation
Department of Energy (DoE)
SBIR/STTR Phase I
SBIR/STTR Phase II
R01, U01, Carb-X, HEAL or Pioneer Grant
EERE or ARPA-E Award
One of our government funding experts will contact you within 48 hours to schedule a phone call.